top of page

Localized security system

Localized security system

In a localized security system use case, language models are used to process and analyze data from local devices, such as cameras, sensors, or alarms, to detect threats, identify anomalies, or generate security alerts. Here, we compare the performance of small language models (SLMs) versus large language models (LLMs) in terms of efficiency and speed for this scenario.


Use Case: Intrusion Detection in a Localized Security System


Scenario

A home security system employs AI to monitor data from motion sensors, door cameras, and alarms. The system analyzes real-time data to detect possible intrusions and notify homeowners. Both SLMs and LLMs are evaluated for processing data to identify suspicious activities and raise alerts.


Key Metrics for Comparison

  • Latency: Time taken to process sensor data and generate alerts.

  • Memory Usage: RAM is required to run the security system on local hardware.

  • Accuracy: Precision in identifying actual threats versus false positives.

  • Energy Consumption: Power required to operate the model continuously.

  • Cost Efficiency: Overall cost based on hardware and energy consumption.


Metric

  • Model Size

  • Latency (average)

  • Memory Usage (RAM)

  • Compute Power

  • Accuracy (Threat Detection)

  • Energy Consumption


Small Language Model (SLM)

  • 120M parameters

  • 20 ms/sensor event

  • 250 MB

  • CPU on a local device

  • 85%

  • 5W


Large Language Model (LLM)

  • 1.5B parameters

  • 1,200 ms/sensor event

  • 10 GB

  • High-end CPU/GPU required

  • 92%

  • 50W


Technical Insights

  1. Latency: The SLM processes a sensor event in just 20 milliseconds, compared to the LLM's 1,200 milliseconds. This makes the SLM 60x faster, ensuring that real-time threat detection is possible without delays. Latency is crucial in security systems, where quick detection and response can prevent potential breaches.

  2. Memory and Compute Requirements: The SLM requires only 250 MB of RAM to operate efficiently, allowing it to run smoothly on standard local devices (e.g., smart home hubs or even basic edge devices). In contrast, the LLM's 10 GB of RAM requirement makes it impractical for on-device use without significant hardware upgrades, likely requiring a high-end CPU or GPU setup, which is overkill for most localized security systems.

  3. Energy Efficiency: The SLM consumes only 5W of power, making it highly energy-efficient and ideal for 24/7 operation on local devices, such as battery-powered smart home hubs. The LLM, with a 50W consumption, would require constant power and active cooling, making it inefficient and expensive to run in local environments.

  4. Throughput: The SLM can handle a much higher throughput of data (sensor events per second), which is especially useful when monitoring multiple security devices, such as cameras and motion detectors, concurrently. The LLM, with its heavy resource demands, would struggle to provide real-time analysis without offloading some tasks to the cloud, which could introduce privacy concerns or latency.


Business Insights

  1. Cost Efficiency: The SLM's low memory and compute requirements allow it to run efficiently on standard home security hardware without the need for expensive infrastructure. This makes it a highly cost-effective solution for home or small office security systems. In contrast, the LLM would require costly upgrades to hardware, such as GPUs or dedicated high-performance servers, increasing both upfront and operational costs.

  2. Speed of Response: With an SLM, threat detection happens in real-time, as it processes sensor data in just 20 milliseconds per event. This ensures that homeowners or security personnel can receive immediate alerts, helping them to act swiftly in the event of a security breach. The LLM, which takes over a second to process an event, may cause delays in alert generation, which can be critical in security scenarios.

  3. Energy and Cost Savings: Since the SLM consumes 5W of power compared to the LLM’s 50W, it is much more energy-efficient, reducing long-term operational costs. This is especially important for localized security systems, which need to run continuously, often on battery or low-power devices. The low energy consumption also makes SLMs ideal for off-grid applications.

  4. Privacy and Security: The SLM can operate entirely on-device, keeping all data local to the user’s hardware, which ensures better data privacy. This is critical in security systems, as sensitive footage and sensor data are often involved. LLMs, due to their large size and compute needs, may need to offload some of their processing to the cloud, introducing privacy concerns and potential vulnerabilities if sensitive data is transmitted over the internet.

  5. Sufficient Accuracy for Most Use Cases: While the LLM has a slight edge in accuracy (92% versus 85%), the SLM’s accuracy is still sufficient for most home security applications, especially with frequent retraining or fine-tuning. The slight trade-off in accuracy is outweighed by the significant gains in speed, cost, and energy efficiency, making the SLM a pragmatic choice for businesses looking to balance security and cost.


Benchmarking Example

Consider a localized security system monitoring 10 sensor devices (motion detectors, cameras, door alarms), each generating 100 events per minute.


  • SLM Processing Time: 20 ms/event → 0.03 seconds to process 10,000 events (100 events x 10 sensors).

  • LLM Processing Time: 1,200 ms/event → 12,000 seconds (200 minutes) to process 10,000 events.


The SLM can handle this workload in real-time, processing 10,000 sensor events in under 1 second, whereas the LLM would take over 3 hours, making it unsuitable for real-time security applications.


Conclusion

For localized security system use cases, such as home and office intrusion detection, small language models (SLMs) significantly outperform large language models (LLMs) in terms of efficiency, speed, and cost-effectiveness.

The SLM’s faster response time, lower energy consumption, and on-device operation make it ideal for real-time security monitoring, especially in resource-constrained environments where privacy, low latency, and energy efficiency are critical. While LLMs offer higher accuracy, the SLM's performance and accuracy (85%) are more than adequate for typical security applications, where speed and reliability are paramount.


This makes SLMs a better option for businesses and individuals seeking a cost-effective, privacy-friendly, and real-time security solution, without the need for expensive hardware or cloud services.


bottom of page