top of page

Intelligent tutoring systems

Intelligent tutoring systems

In an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) use case, small language models (SLMs) and large language models (LLMs) can be compared in terms of efficiency, speed, and educational impact. An ITS is designed to provide personalized learning experiences by answering student queries, offering explanations, and guiding them through problem-solving processes.


Use Case: Intelligent Tutoring System for Math and Science Concepts


Scenario

A learning platform uses an ITS to help students from grades 6 to 12 with math and science topics, such as algebra, geometry, physics, and chemistry. The system must provide quick responses, personalized feedback, and adapt to the learning pace of each student. Given the large number of daily interactions, the platform needs an efficient, scalable solution that balances speed, accuracy, and cost.


Key Metrics for Comparison

  • Response Time: Time taken to generate a relevant answer to a student's query.

  • Memory Usage: The computational resources (RAM) needed to run the model.

  • Throughput: Number of student queries the system can handle per second.

  • Accuracy: How closely the model’s answers align with correct, detailed explanations.

  • Cost Efficiency: Operational cost of running the model at scale.

  • Personalization Capability: The model’s ability to tailor responses to individual student needs.


Metric

  • Response Time

  • Memory Usage (RAM)

  • Throughput

  • Answer Accuracy

  • Resource Cost

  • Personalization Capability

Small Language Model (SLM)

  • 50 ms per query

  • 400 MB

  • 20 queries per second

  • 85%

  • Low

  • Moderate

Large Language Model (LLM)

  • 800 ms per query

  • 6 GB

  • 1 query per second

  • 95%

  • High

  • High

Technical Insights

  • Response Time and Throughput:

    • SLM: Small language models excel in speed, with a response time of 50 ms per query, making them ideal for real-time, interactive tutoring where students expect immediate feedback. The model can handle 20 queries per second, which allows it to manage many simultaneous users without lag.

    • LLM: In contrast, large language models take 800 ms per query, which, while still fast, may cause noticeable delays, particularly during high traffic periods or in fast-paced learning environments.


  • Memory Usage and Resource Efficiency:

    • SLMs require 400 MB of RAM, making them highly suitable for platforms with standard hardware. This allows the tutoring system to run efficiently on lower-cost infrastructure or even on-device in mobile apps or embedded systems.

    • LLMs, needing 6 GB of RAM, require GPU acceleration or powerful cloud-based servers, driving up the cost of deployment and limiting their use in low-resource environments like mobile devices or low-budget schools.


  • Answer Accuracy:

    • LLMs provide 95% accuracy in delivering detailed and nuanced answers, especially in complex topics like physics or chemistry where precision matters. For higher-order thinking or complex problem-solving, LLMs excel at mimicking human-like explanations.

    • SLMs, while slightly less accurate at 85%, can still effectively handle straightforward problems, offer clear explanations, and answer questions related to core concepts. This is particularly useful for fundamental topics, such as solving algebraic equations or understanding basic physics laws.


  • Cost Efficiency:

    • SLMs are significantly cheaper to operate due to their lower hardware requirements. They can run on standard CPU systems, which reduces both the upfront and ongoing costs of operation. This makes them ideal for educational platforms with limited budgets, especially those serving students in developing regions.

    • LLMs, requiring GPU-powered infrastructure, incur higher operational costs, particularly at scale. For example, cloud costs for running LLMs can be prohibitive for public schools or smaller institutions.


  • Personalization Capability:

    • LLMs can offer more sophisticated personalized responses, adapting to individual student learning styles and providing in-depth explanations tailored to the specific needs of the student. For example, they might rephrase explanations based on student feedback or adjust the level of difficulty in real-time.

    • SLMs can still offer some level of personalization, such as adjusting the complexity of explanations based on student proficiency, but their customization capabilities are more limited compared to LLMs. They’re better suited for systems with predefined levels of difficulty or straightforward adaptive learning paths.


Business Insights

  • Cost-Efficiency:

    • For educational businesses aiming to provide affordable learning solutions, SLMs present a clear advantage. Their low memory requirements and ability to run on standard hardware make them more cost-effective. This is especially important for platforms catering to large-scale, low-cost education, such as massive open online courses (MOOCs) or public school systems.

    • LLMs are more expensive to maintain due to their demand for GPU-based infrastructure. They might be better suited for premium services or high-stakes tutoring, where accuracy and tailored learning are critical, such as preparing for standardized exams or in-depth tutoring in STEM subjects.


  • Response Speed and Student Engagement:

    • SLMs, with their faster response times (50 ms vs. 800 ms), are better for real-time engagement. Instant feedback keeps students motivated and prevents frustration from waiting for responses. This is especially relevant in tutoring systems where fast-paced, interactive exercises are a core part of the learning experience.

    • LLMs, though slower, might be worth the trade-off in environments where answer quality is paramount, such as explaining complex concepts in detail. However, for younger students or simpler topics, the speed of SLMs can be more beneficial for engagement.


  • Scalability:

    • SLMs are more scalable due to their low computational demands. An ITS powered by SLMs can easily handle thousands of simultaneous users, making them a perfect fit for high-volume educational platforms. For example, a platform with 10,000 active users can scale up without significantly increasing costs.

    • LLMs, though offering better quality, are harder to scale due to their computational demands. Scaling an ITS using LLMs to support a large number of users requires significant investment in cloud infrastructure and may lead to higher operating costs.


  • Use Case Suitability:

    • SLMs are particularly suitable for K-12 tutoring or subjects that rely on clear, straightforward instruction. In these scenarios, speed and cost-efficiency outweigh the need for ultra-precise answers, and students benefit from the immediacy of feedback.

    • LLMs may be better suited for higher education or advanced tutoring systems where students require more detailed, nuanced feedback. For example, they can help explain intricate concepts in calculus, organic chemistry, or even literature analysis with a level of sophistication that surpasses SLMs.


Benchmarking Example

An educational platform serves 50,000 students daily, with each student submitting 20 queries on average in subjects like math and science.


  • SLM:

    • Response Time: 50 ms per query

    • Memory Usage: 400 MB

    • Throughput: 20 queries per second

    • Total queries: 1,000,000 queries daily

    • Total time to handle 1 million queries: 14 hours (based on throughput)

    • Cost: Low (standard CPU infrastructure)


  • LLM:

    • Response Time: 800 ms per query

    • Memory Usage: 6 GB

    • Throughput: 1 query per second

    • Total queries: 1,000,000 queries daily

    • Total time to handle 1 million queries: 277 hours (based on throughput)

    • Cost: High (GPU infrastructure)


Conclusion

For an intelligent tutoring system, the choice between a small language model and a large language model depends on the balance of speed, cost, and accuracy required.


  • SLMs offer the best solution when real-time interaction, low operational costs, and scalability are the primary concerns. With 50 ms response times and the ability to handle large volumes of student queries efficiently, they are ideal for K-12 education platforms or any system where immediacy and volume are critical factors.

  • LLMs, while slower, provide greater depth and accuracy in their responses, which can be essential for more complex subject matter or advanced students. However, they come at a significantly higher cost and are less scalable in environments with heavy query traffic.


For businesses, SLMs represent a more affordable and scalable solution, especially for platforms looking to serve large numbers of students without incurring prohibitive costs. For premium services or niche educational tools that require advanced personalization and nuanced explanations, LLMs can provide an unmatched learning experience, albeit at a higher price point.


Stay updated with the latest in language models and natural language processing. Subscribe to our newsletter for weekly insights and news.

Stay Tuned for Exciting Updates

  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

© 2023 SLM Spotlight. All Rights Reserved.

bottom of page